Jul. 19, 2016
By AGATHA NGOTHO , @agathangotho
Dr Murenga Mwimali a scientist from Kalro explains about the experiment of developing a variety that is resistant to the stem borer at the confined field trial site in Kitale.
Farmers in Kitale will benefit from a technology that will reduce the attack on maize from the stem borer pest.
Kitale is part of the bread basket area in Kenya but the stem borer has been a big problem resulting to about 25 per cent losses of the crop in Trans Nzoia
county according to Kenneth Kagai, the county’s agriculture deputy director.
“Much of the maize consumed in the country comes from this region hence the need to seek for a solution to address the pest problem.
Any technology that can address this issue will go a long way in ensuring that farmers get enough produce for themselves and the country,” he said.
Kagai added that the effects from the pest are normally low for those farmers that plant early, which is by the second week of March.
“If you plant after the second week of April, then the stem borer becomes a problem,” said Kagai adding that this year, about 106,000 hectares are under maize farming and the county expects to harvest about five million bags.
67-year old Atanasi Aginga who has grown maize for over 30 years says the stem borer which is locally referred to as ‘tsingetse’, affects the crop two months after planting.
“After top dressing, the pest infests the maize stem and cob as the crop grows, and this reduces the yields. The pest first started destroying sorghum when many farmers were growing the crop and shifted to maize crops,” says the farmer from Kitale.
Aginga says for those farmers that cannot afford pesticides, they use traditional methods such as ash to control the pest.
“Agriculture experts had also advised us to use the push-pull method (where they plant desmodium to attract the stem borer from the maize crop to nappier grass) as another control measure.
However, the two methods have only reduced the stem borer infestation on maize temporarily,” he added.
To address the problem, scientists from the Water Efficient Maize for Africa project are carrying out an experiment using a genetically modified technology on how to tackle the pest in a confined field trial site in Kitale.
Sylvester Oikeh, the Wema project manager in Africa said this is the second experiment being done in Africa after South Africa and that it is safe to the environment and for human consumption.
“Farmers will not have to use chemicals to spray the pest as the maize variety being developed will control the pest hence safe for human consumption and the environment,” said Oikeh.
Dr Murenga Mwimali from the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organisation said in Kenya, the stem borers causes about 4,000,000 metric tonnes worth of maize losses which translates to USD 80 million (Sh8 billion) losses annually.
He added that the aim of the experiment is to develop a technology that combines both drought tolerant and insect resistant in one package as a seed.
“We are targeting to offer a solution to the maize stalkborer (Buseola fusca), common in the highland maize growing areas of Kitale and Uasin Gishu, and the maize stemborer (Chilo Partellus) common in the lowland areas of Ukambani,” said Murenga.
He added that the experiments being undertaken in confined field trials in Kitale and Kiboko, will also seek to generate data on the insect damage which has been missing in Kenya.
“We want to find out if we can be able to control the African stem borers and the spotted or lowland stem borers not only in the laboratory and green house but also in the field.
We hope to get effective results in a bid to alleviate food insecurity in the country,” said Murenga who is the project’s coordinator in Kenya.
The Water Efficient for Africa (WEMA) breeding programme has built its reputation over the last decade as a credible maize improvement project in Sub-Saharan Africa. Apart from developing a robust product pipeline of 75 maize hybrids, it has also offered seed companies and farmers a wide selection of products.
Furthermore, the project prides in working together with seed companies to help solve day to day challenges by farmers. Drought and food security are the core concerns of the project. It is with the vision of like-minded private companies like Ultravetis that WEMA is meeting its project goal of improving yields on drought-prone farmlands.
The long-term goal is to deploy these new varieties and make them available to smallholder farmers royalty-free through local African seed companies.
Inaugural discussion between Dr. Gospel Omanya, Senior Manager at AATF and Ultravetis Director, Mr. Wachira Muriithi, yielded a fruitful partnership that brought Ultravetis into maize seed business. Ultravetis was first licensed to sell its first WEMA hybrid (WE1101) in October 2013 rainy season. Within the last 4 years, Ultravetis have four more licensed WEMA maize hybrids, namely, WE2109, WE2107, WE2111 and WE3106. Ultravetis is a good example of companies that have been bold to tap in to opportunities and fly with it. Through WEMA the company has been able to increase its product range and network coverage.
The WEMA varieties are used by farmers in over 17 counties. Seed companies have ensured stable supply by partnering with agro-dealers in these regions. Ultravetis this year, enhanced its product visibility by branding its WEMA product by calling it ‘EvaZea’ the name has catch up like wild fire and is popular with farmers in its strongholds such as Western and Central Kenya.
Through aggressive marketing, Ultravetis sold over 50 tonnes of WE1101 in 2015. This is a commendable effort for the new entrant in the maize seed business. This year, Ultravetis spread its wings to Tanzania with the first sale of 4.5 tonnes of the hybrid WE2109.
Through the support of African Agricultural Technology Foundation (AATF), which have continuously offered Ultravetis technical backing stopping on breeding high quality hybrid. Furthermore, WEMA has given companies a chance to interact and partly own hi-tech breeding technology at no cost (royalty free). It is AATF’s hope that more seed companies will join WEMA and buy-in into the climate smart technologies like drought-tolerant maize and insect-pest protect maize hybrid. Together, The AATF and Ultravetis partnership look forward to better maize harvests and livelihoods for our farmers.
WEMA is a public-private partnership founded in 2008 to develop and deploy royalty-free African drought-tolerant and insect-pest protected (climate-smart) white maize varieties for farmers. The project strives to increase maize yield and stability, protect and promote farmers’ investment in adopting best management practices.by
Seeds of Gold, Daily Nation
Friday April 29 2016
Your latest kid on the block on matters seeds is Elgon Prestige 02 (WE1101). What are some of its defining features?
This seed is a product of the partnership between the African Agricultural Technology Foundation (AATF), Kenya Agricultural Livestock and Research Organisation (KALRO) and WEMA–Water Efficient Maize for Africa, a project. Its biggest selling point is that it is a drought and other stress-tolerant variety. It does well in conditions of reduced rainfall. It is high-yielding because it is a double cropper.
That means every stem has two cobs. We have seen farmers harvest up to between 35 and 40 bags an acre. This is way higher than 10-15 bags which other seeds give from an acre. Having been developed to brave climate change, this variety takes 90 days for green maize to be ready for the market. Those targeting dry maize will have harvest it in four months.
So do you have varieties for the various regions?
No, this is a one-fit-all variety for all medium to low altitude regions. Anywhere from coffee zones to the sea level should be alright for Elgon Prestige O2 (WE1101). It is good for Bungoma, Kisii, Bomet, Narok, Kirinyaga, Meru and other areas of low to mid altitudes.
What are the other stress conditions outside of drought that this seed is resistant to?
This seed is resistant to most of the severe diseases and pests affecting maize. They include the Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease (MLND) and the stem borer. It is also strong in the stay green property, which makes it very good as a fodder crop. The stem remains green and succulent even after the cob has ripened. It’s also strong on the grain durability aspect, which makes it less susceptible to post-harvest loss. It is sweet, making it good for roasting as well as making ugali. The crop also has a good husk cover which arms it to resist birds attack and rain. Rain and birds usually wreak havoc on the maize plant, causing huge losses to farmers even when the crop has done well.
Where can farmers get the seeds?
They are virtually available in all major agro-dealers countrywide.
What else do you sell?
We are an agro-input supplier and I am the seeds manager. That means I co-ordinate all the seeds business in the country. We are involved in distribution of cabbage, onion, carrot, water melon, sweet and sweet pepper seeds, among others. The one that takes the pride of place, at the moment, though, is Elgon Prestige 02 (WE1101), the drought-tolerant maize variety I spoke about.
What prepares you for this job?
My training is in agriculture. I have a Bsc in Horticulture from Jomo Kenyatta University of Science and Technology. That means I understand the science and business of crops. Experience also horns skills.
I have been in this field for many years. As I go out marketing, I don’t just do sales. As a crop expert, I offer professional advice too. I mix salesmanship with extension to give value to our customers.
From your work with farmers all these years, what would you say is the biggest challenge facing farmers?
The biggest problem is lack of technical knowhow. There are so many appropriate technologies, but farmers lack the knowledge and skills to apply them. With increased interest in farming as a business, though, a lot is now happening on the information front, and the efforts have begun bearing fruit. What you guys are doing in Seeds of Gold, for instance, is invaluable contribution to the development of agriculture in Kenya. The Ministry of Agriculture and the counties are now helping out too through their extension departments. We, agro-input suppliers, do our bit too.
December , 2015
By Evelyn Situma
Jotham’s maize yield has increased from 10 kilograms to 10 bags of 90kg maize from when he started farming DroughtTEGO™ maize hybrid developed by Water Efficient Maize for Africa (WEMA) project in 2014.
For seven years, he harvested only 10 kilograms of maize from a quarter of an acre piece of land (equivalent to 0.1 t/ha). “At the time I knew nothing about technology. That is why I never got much from my farm. But now my yield has increased because of DroughtTEGO™ maize seed and good agronomy practices,” he said.
WEMA through its project partner, Rural Outreach Programme (ROP), a community based farmer organization in Western Kenya has been conducting field demonstrations (demo) for farmers in the region. It’s through the awareness drives that Jotham was approached to host a field demo at his farm.
“They set up a 10 metre by 10 metre demo plot with several maize varieties on each. TEGO variety- WE1101 out-did the rest,” said Jotham. He harvested 70 kg from the demo plot.
Jotham Apamo puts across a point during an interview in Western Kenya.
His yield has increased from 10kg per quarter acre (equivalent to 0.1 t/ha) to 10 bags of 90kg (4.5t/ha) on half acre farm after adopting DroughtTEGO, a maize brand from the Water Efficient Maize for Africa (WEMA) project. PHOTO/AATF
In 2015, he bought TEGO seed and planted it on half an acre farm. The harvest, he said, was his best- 10 bags of 90kg maize (4.5 t/ha). Jotham is now a TEGO champion in his community. He convinced parents in a neighboring primary school to adopt TEGO and donate a bag of maize each season for the school feeding program.
“Our children are no longer hungry,” he said.
A public-private consortium behind the scientific development of drought and pest resistant high yielding maize varieties says last week’s approval for national field trials is the way to go.
Acting Kenya Agricultural Livestock and research Organisation (Kalro) Director General Eliud Kiplimo, and the African Agricultural Technology Foundation (AATF) Executive Director Denis Kyetere said they would immediately embark on the next step of identifying suitable varieties for various regions that are adversely affected by stem borers.
“This will help farmers harvest enough to feed their families and get a surplus, which they can sell to increase their incomes, thereby strengthening local communities,” said Dr Kyetere.
Dr Kiplimo said success of the Wema Bt maize portends a bright future for agriculture, where the government could give science a central role in providing solutions to food shortages and fighting pests and diseases.
“It will inject new interest in using scientific innovations and fast-track adoption of appropriate technologies to address national food security,” he said when he disclosed the new development to researchers currently meeting in Dar es salaam to review the project’s progress.
AATF and Kalro launched scientific trials after socio-economic studies showed the spotted stem borer (Chilo partellus) and the African Stem Borer (Busseola fusca) wreaked havoc across maize plantations, causing smallholder farmers a Sh9 billion loss, equivalent to 400,000 bags of maize, which then forced the government to import the staple.
CONTROLLED MAIZE INFESTATION
The three-year trial led to development of Bt maize varieties that effectively controlled maize infestation and damage by the two major pests.
The NPT process, they said, would take two years as the variety release process takes about two planting seasons before the maize is eventually reaches farmers.
It is after the trials and testing that the minister for Agriculture sanctions release of proven Bt Maize varieties suitable for the various regions for propagation and sale to growers.
The statement said Kenyan and African farmers need a range of options including access to GM technology that could increase their yields and help Kenya fight food insecurity.
The first GM crop testing began in the 1980s and there have now been more than 2,500 regulatory approvals granted by 60 countries on more than 300 products globally.
Sunday Akile addresses the Open Forum on Agricultural Biotechnology in Kampala. (Credit: Christopher Bendana)
KAMPALA – Sunday Akile, the programme officer for legal and policy biosafety at the African Biosafety Network of Expertise (ABNE), has lauded Ugandan scientists doing research on biotechnology.
ABNE is an institution of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD).
“Our scientists have scored high in this field. We move with our heads high,” he told participants attending the Open Forum on Agricultural Biotechnology (OFAB) at Hotel Royale on Thursday.
Akile was presenting a paper titled Regulatory Status of Biotechnology Applications in the East Africa Community.
ABNE is involved in building capacity of national and institutional biosafety institutions across the continent.
He said that though Uganda had made strides in biotechnology research, the research had stagnated due to lack of a law.
The National Biotechnology and Biosafety Bill 2012 – meant to regulate biotechnology – is still under debate in parliament.
Phyllis Chemutai, Woman MP for Kapchorwa district called on parliament to pass the bill before end of term of the current parliament. She said the bill will help scientists address agricultural challenges of climate change and food insecurity.
Dr Theresa Ssengoobe, a member of the National Agricultural Research Organisation Council, said the bill would allow us pick out what helps us and leave out what is not useful.
She cited Kenya which banned the introduction of Bt maize but has allowed testing of Water Efficient Maize for Africa (WEMA) maize. Both are genetically modified products.
“We want a system that allows us to go with what benefits us and leave out what does not benefit us,” said Ssengoobe.
Uganda is currently undertaking confined field trials: The crops include bananas, cassava, maize, rice and potatoes.
The National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kawanda has bred a banana resistant to banana bacterial wilt while the National Crops Resources Research Institute, Namulonge has successfully bred a cassava resistant to Cassava Brown Streak Disease. The two are Uganda’s staple food.by
By Sukhbir Dhillon
Acute food shortage has threatened the forty eight countries which make up sub-Saharan Africa. The reasons have been many, starting from climate change, government policy and farming practices like generations of subsistence farming which has depleted the nutrients in soil and made it less fertile. The region is becoming more arid, adding difficulty to the growing season.
The drought is now threatening southern and East Africa, which is pushing about fifty million people towards famine and according to forecasters, this is just the beginning.
As per the World Bank’s estimations if the current trends persist, approximately forty percent of the land that is used for cultivating corn in sub-Saharan Africa will not be able to sustain the present varieties by 2030.
According to Monsanto, the sustainable agriculture company headquartered in Creve Coeur, Greater St. Louis, Missouri, says it has some solution for the problem. It is testing different varieties of corn that grow better in dry weather and is more resistant to insects, in collaboration with Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation along with others on small plots in South Africa, Mozambique, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda.
Project director, Mark Edge for Monsanto’s Water Efficient Maize for Africa says, “The long-term growth has to be looked at as a business opportunity.” He added, “The short-term challenge is creating the market and understanding what investments can do that.” The project involves hybrid seeds and not genetically modified varieties which Monsanto produces and has been centre of controversies in recent times.by
By Catherine Cheney 17 March 2016
The sixth of 10 children, Florence Wambugu knew at an early age there must be a better way to ward off pests than mixing ashes and soot. Her mother sold the one cow from their family farm to send her daughter to school and test the theory.
Wambugu would go on to receive a scholarship from the United States Department of Agriculture to spend time at Monsanto, the biotechnology powerhouse in St. Louis, Missouri, where she studied genetic engineering for the sweet potato.
Since returning to Kenya, where she is CEO of Africa Harvest Biotech International, she has extended technologies such as tissue culture for bananas to rural smallholder farmers.
While she says her work is increasing yields and incomes, Wambugu added that the path to commercialization has many challenges. As Kenya considers whether to lift its ban on genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, representatives on both sides of the debate are working to make their positions known. Some, like Wambugu, say GMO bans block African farmers from the technological advances available in the developed world. Others say that the indebtedness that can result from the use of external inputs such as hybrid seeds and chemical fertilizers is not only harmful but criminal.
The debate in Kenya reflects a discussion happening across the African continent about the best ways to feed 9 billion people by 2050 while also preserving the planet for future generations. How might African farmers enhance their productivity and increase their resilience to climate change without compromising the health of their land? How might American companies play a role without short-term gains standing in the way of long-term sustainability?
Such questions are central to discussions taking place from conference rooms at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in Seattle, to banana farms in East Africa. And whether they favor indigenous approaches, scientific technologies, or some combination of the two, global development professionals are trying to build on what they think is working while also navigating government policies, donor positions and farmer preferences.
Advocates of biotechnology say African farmers cannot increase their yields without embracing the technologies that have helped boost productivity elsewhere.
“Most of these farmers don’t use inputs, so it’s by definition organic,” Luc Christiaensen, a senior economist at the World Bank focused on rural development and food security, told Devex. “So the question is can you increase production enough just by organics? I don’t think so.”
Companies such as Monsanto see their work as vital for the future of African agriculture. One example comes from the company’s participation in Water Efficient Maize for Africa, or WEMA, a partnership led by the African Agricultural Technology Foundation in Kenya, and funded by the Gates Foundation, the Howard G. Buffett Foundation and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Monsanto has developed drought tolerant maize, or corn, providing the genetic traits royalty free to African seed companies through a partnership with the five National Agricultural Research Systems in Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique and South Africa.
These countries “fundamentally embrace the idea that technology and innovation needs to be part of the solution for smallholder farmers,” said Monsanto’s Mark Edge, who is also the director of partnerships for WEMA. “We have to demonstrate the value and build the regulatory capacity to vouch for the fact that this technology is safe and will benefit farmers in these countries.”
Smallholder farmers in Kenya had access to the first conventional hybrid developed through the WEMA partnership, under the brand DroughtTEGO. And GM approaches could be introduced “pending research and development results and regulatory approvals in each of the WEMA countries,” such as the potential lift of the GMO ban in Kenya.
Another WEMA partner is the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, which launched in Mexico in 1943 to develop varieties of wheat and maize and help drive the original Green Revolution, a set of initiatives that increased agricultural production in Latin America and Asia.
African countries that have incorporated the signature technologies of the green revolution report promising results. Between 2000 and 2014, Rwanda, which has a mandatory modernization plan, produced three times more grain, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Agribusinesses such as Monsanto have a financial incentive to participate in African agriculture, and that is precisely what worries critics of biotechnology. The company is donating technology for its WEMA partnership, but since it takes up to 13 years and $136 million dollars to introduce a single biotechnology trait, the long-term plan is to present other technologies for a price.
This is analogous to the pharmaceuticals industry where drug companies spend millions developing new drugs then implement patent protections to get a return on their investment. The challenge in agriculture in comparison to health care is the lack of an insurance system equivalent to help beneficiaries of these technologies to defray the costs.
As a result of partnerships such as the Southern Agriculture Growth Corridor of Tanzania, it’s not uncommon to find Monsanto selling herbicide, or Yara, a chemical company based in Norway, selling fertilizer to rural farmers. Many farmers characterize this as companies with special interests introducing new inputs without consulting them, requiring them to buy fertilizers and pesticides for those hybrid seeds, and then preventing them from replanting seeds from one harvest to the next.
While Monsanto cannot sell GM seeds in most African countries, there are concerns that if restrictions continue to relax, Monsanto will prevent African farmers from replanting seeds from one season to the next, as they have done in the U.S.
“Many organizations that think they do development work want African farmers to be like American farmers,” Janet Maro, the founder and director of Sustainable Agriculture Tanzania, told Devex. “I would tell them to support local technologies in the communities where they work, and not bring in foreign concepts where, when they are finished, the technology goes back with the people who brought it.”
Maro grew up as a member of the banana-growing Chaga tribe in Old Moshi Village, near the base of Mount Kilimanjaro. She acknowledged the value of tissue culture technology, but pointed to research the Gates Foundation has funded on GM bananas as an example of the disconnect between what farmers want and need and what others think is best for them. Part of the justification for vitamin A fortification is to improve vision, she said, even though her parents and grandparents who grew up on these bananas had perfect vision their whole lives.
Chris Macoloo, regional director for Africa at World Neighbors, said he is concerned that if Kenya lifts its ban on GMOs, the decision will benefit large corporations rather than the smallholder farmers who produce 80 percent of the food in Africa. In Rwanda, for example, farmers who cannot afford to comply with the enforced modernization plan risk losing their land. In South Africa, meanwhile, cross-pollination has all but eliminated non-GMO maize.
The unfortunate reality of the emphasis on food security being defined as increasing staple yields for all smallholders is that some farmers who do not adopt innovations will be left behind, said Simon Winter, senior vice president of development at TechnoServe, which is working in Africa to link farmers to new markets.
The global development community plays a key role in strengthening market systems, educating farmers about practices or technologies that will benefit them, and making sure there are adequate safety nets and support systems for those who do not do as well as their neighbors, he said.
Regenerative agriculture, which leverages organic methods to link farming with soil health, can put power back in the hands of farmers, Kate Schecter, World Neighbors CEO, told Devex.
“Funders can be slow to adopt this ‘new way’ of doing agriculture, which is in fact the old way of doing agriculture,” she added.
Practically speaking, American nongovernmental organizations that favor strategies (integrating crops and livestock) over promoting inputs (hybrid seeds and chemical fertilizers) should apply for grants or agreements that fund the work they are doing, rather than going after consulting contracts, which might specify how the job of improving agriculture should be done, she said.
The hybrid approach
While global development organizations diverge on the question of GMOs, they must converge around the ultimate goal of sustainable agriculture, said Angela Hansen, who leads agriculture and food security work at Dalberg, with clients including the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa.
“If we can’t find something that is competitive in terms of productivity, we’re actually systematically disenfranchising these producers and leaving them in this state of exceptionally low yields, which is a poverty trap,” she said. “How can Africa become competitive in agricultural value chains and close the yield gaps? That is going to require technology and focused investment and more scale.”
The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa is thinking in these terms, with its goal of starting “a uniquely African Green Revolution.”
“We know there were tremendous gains in food production and millions of lives were saved from famine during the green revolution, but there were also unintended consequences,” said Brantley Browning, a policy and advocacy officer at the Gates Foundation, a co-founder of AGRA. “There is a real chance to learn from history and see sustainable productivity gains happen in Africa that are inclusive and beneficial to smallholder farmers.”
With 54 countries and extreme heterogeneity of crops and diets across the continent, Africa may need a range of revolutions to meet local needs and global goals. AGRA is collaborating with more than 100 seed companies, which represent a third of the market, to produce hybrid seeds. Organizations such as One Acre Fund, a nonprofit social enterprise, are providing farmers with seeds, fertilizer, training and financing for these inputs.
Major donors, such as the U.S. government in its Feed the Future initiative, identify biotechnology as an important tool to overcome the production challenges traditional breeding “has been unable to address.”
“While biotechnology is part of a package of new tools and technologies that can increase agricultural production and reduce poverty, it’s just one of many options available to Feed the Future countries as they work to improve food security,” a spokesperson for USAID told Devex. “The choice about whether or not to use biotechnology is up to each partner country.”
In the field
Acknowledging that farmers suffer most from the lack of constructive engagement between the two sides of the GMOs debate, development professionals are doing more to merge the best of technology and tradition.
Mercy Corps, the humanitarian agency based in Portland, Oregon, has experienced constraints not from donors, but from government policies, in its work in agricultural development in Africa. The organization has found that evidence is the best way to change — and open — minds.
“As long as we can produce evidence that the approaches we are using work and have positive impact on productivity without negatively impacting the environment, we are generally free to promote what we think is best,” Sandrine Chetail, the director of Mercy Corps’ agriculture technical support unit, told Devex.
“When governments subsidize inputs and promote certain crops and technologies to be used through their extension agents, investments and policies, it becomes difficult for development organizations to promote alternative crops and technologies,” she said.
The FAO, meanwhile, has proposed a combination of methods through its “Save and Grow” model for more sustainable intensification of smallholder crop production. The plan calls for regenerative agriculture practices that strengthen the livelihoods of farmers and reduce the pressures on the environment.
The private sector is also emerging as a key player in a hybrid approach. Beyond developing and distributing seeds, fertilizers and pesticides, public-private partnerships are modernizing and mechanizing approaches from harvest to storage to transport.
African Development Bank President Akinwumi Adesina has pointed to his work in Nigeria as a success story for public-private partnerships. During his term as minister of agriculture, he helped cut the number of people suffering from hunger in half. Adesina has argued for the need to accelerate investment in research and extension systems to scale these success stories and spur agricultural transformation across the continent.
“Only by rapidly transforming agriculture can Africa lift hundreds of million of people out of poverty into wealth,” he said. “A bold plan to transform agriculture will boost local food production, reduce food import bills, conserve foreign exchange, increase domestic savings and assure strong macroeconomic and fiscal stability.”
The Gates Foundation’s Browning said he does not believe in a one-size-fits-all model. “We believe smallholder farmers in Africa, just like farmers elsewhere in the world, should have a range of choices,” he said. “Applying one ideology and saying you can only do organic or you can only benefit from advanced genetic techniques fails to address the complexity of agriculture.”
Whether they promote practices such as permaculture, where the main input is knowledge, or believe that better seeds lead to better lives, American NGOs in Africa need to demonstrate the impact of those approaches, identify an economic benefit to encourage adoption, and work with farmers who are already vulnerable and being asked to take risks to find the way forward, said Chetail of Mercy Corps.
“Using a participatory approach here is key,” she said. “We come with our knowledge, farmers come with theirs, and together we can take steps to improve what is being done by testing learning, adapting and testing again.”